Welcome to SHOO-SHOO, RAH-RAH! The Duquesne Dukes Basketball Fan Message Board!
One of America's Great Message Boards - Any Inappropriate Posts Will Be Deleted! Posting on this Message Board is a privilege, not a right. No obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable material, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected is to be posted. All postings belong to the individual poster. Postings/posters may be deleted if found objectionable.
A new policy on this forum includes 7-30 day suspensions of users who violate posting rules. There will be no warnings, just suspensions. The goal is for this to be a place to discuss Duquesne basketball strategy, results, frustrations, pride, and anything else pertaining to Duquesne basketball without inappropriate/personal attacks. It should not be that difficult. I do not think Dru is a bad coach at all. This year, and I am sure you have heard this before, is that it’s not about the X’s and O’s But the Jimmy’s and Joe’s. I do not think Dru is a bad coach at all. This year, and I am sure you have heard this before, is that it’s not about the X’s and O’s But the Jimmy’s and Joe’s. Dru has certainly coached better than I thought he would in the A-10. I was worried that he would be in way over his head against seasoned A-10 coaches but that hasn’t been the case. He’s only going to get better. I agree that tonight it will not be the coach that wins or loses. We have better players and they have shown the ability to play the type of defense that should beat a team of inferior talent. I do believe though that there were times this season that a superior coaching performance was able to make adjustments against our offense and stop what had been working earlier in the game and our coach had no answer. That happens even to great coaches. Point being, FAM, that I agree tonight is not about the Xs and Os but the Jimmy and Joes but that is not always the case. I do not think Dru is a bad coach at all. This year, and I am sure you have heard this before, is that it’s not about the X’s and O’s But the Jimmy’s and Joe’s. If you look at Dinkins shooting ave vs Dae Dae. Dinkins hits 46% of 2's and 39.5 % of 3's. Dae Dae hit 47% of 2's and 33% of 3's. But Dae Dae played 78% games time vs 71% for Dinkins.. Clark vs Crawford are also very similar. Clark was 47% of 2's and 32% of 3's vs Crawford at 42% of 2's and 42% of 3's, but game time Clark also played 78% of the minutes per game vs just 48% for Crawford. Right now, I would hope the coach doesn't pull Dinkins out after just 4 plus minutes into the game like last game, then pulled Crawford out for another 5 minutes,.but instead plays these two all game like Dae Dae and Clark played last year. It's more than likely to improve our chances of winning. Great point Dinkins & Crawford in regard to extended playing time. Look I like Kareem great kid assist king & can shot foul shots at crunch time. But I believe his sweet spot is at 15 minutes per game. Definitely play him at the end of a close game. Add 2-3 minutes. Kareem is an asset. Go Dukes Great point Dinkins & Crawford in regard to extended playing time. Look I like Kareem great kid assist king & can shot foul shots at crunch time. But I believe his sweet spot is at 15 minutes per game. Definitely play him at the end of a close game. Add 2-3 minutes. Kareem is an asset. Go Dukes Last year, that's how we played it down the stretch and in the tourney. Just another point, if we are going to foul at the end of the game to catch up, do it at the 6 to 8 minutes left when the opponent still has the bad FT players still in, not in the last two minutes when their best FT players just don't miss. By then, it's pointless. The Dukes are 1-4 against the 5 teams with a worse conference record than they do. It’s a huge reason why they are still fighting for the bye. They simply can’t afford to lose this game tonight. Interesting stats on the shooting %’s for Dinkins and Crawford. If it was only that simple. Both Dinkins and Crawford are below average on the ball defenders; they can’t keep the offensive player in front of them putting stress on our bigs and defense to rotate. And they don’t close out well enough to prevent opponents from making a high percentage of 3 point shots. And Dinkins has one of the worst guard steal rates in the league. Interesting stats on the shooting %’s for Dinkins and Crawford. If it was only that simple. Both Dinkins and Crawford are below average on the ball defenders; they can’t keep the offensive player in front of them putting stress on our bigs and defense to rotate. And they don’t close out well enough to prevent opponents from making a high percentage of 3 point shots. And Dinkins has one of the worst guard steal rates in the league. Yes. Getting to the line is a gigantic difference between these guards and last year’s guards. I like the numbers everybody pulled. One thing more about those numbers, though I haven’t crunched them yet, is: I bet Jimmy and Dae Dae’s percentages were decidedly better over the last 10 games and the post season. I remember, Dae Dae particularly, shooting so much better in the final games and the tourneys and thinking it was a big reason we won. So even if the overall numbers are close, when we started winning, I’m guessing those numbers were much better. Interesting stats on the shooting %’s for Dinkins and Crawford. If it was only that simple. Both Dinkins and Crawford are below average on the ball defenders; they can’t keep the offensive player in front of them putting stress on our bigs and defense to rotate. And they don’t close out well enough to prevent opponents from making a high percentage of 3 point shots. And Dinkins has one of the worst guard steal rates in the league. Nice perspective on defense, but statistically both players are about 76% better at scoring this season than Rozier based on number of attempts to actually scoring. Also, on FT's Dinkins and Kareem played nearly the same most minutes this season, but Dinkins shot 67 FT's making 53 which is 79%, the highest on the team, but Karren attempted 50 making 35 which is an ave. of 70%. Our team as a whole plays pretty good defense. How does Roziers over all defense stats compare, and number of steals, See to me, we play defense well enough to win every game, but do not score enough. That's the problem. And I agree, Dae Dae and Clark knew how to get an opponent up in the air and draw the foul. It would have been a big help for anyone on this team to have had that skill. Just one more observation based on statistic's, only Dinkins, Crawford and Hronsky should be launching 3's late in the game when needed. The rest of this team just are not good at 3's. Interesting stats on the shooting %’s for Dinkins and Crawford. If it was only that simple. Both Dinkins and Crawford are below average on the ball defenders; they can’t keep the offensive player in front of them putting stress on our bigs and defense to rotate. And they don’t close out well enough to prevent opponents from making a high percentage of 3 point shots. And Dinkins has one of the worst guard steal rates in the league. Yes. Getting to the line is a gigantic difference between these guards and last year’s guards. I like the numbers everybody pulled. One thing more about those numbers, though I haven’t crunched them yet, is: I bet Jimmy and Dae Dae’s percentages were decidedly better over the last 10 games and the post season. I remember, Dae Dae particularly, shooting so much better in the final games and the tourneys and thinking it was a big reason we won. So even if the overall numbers are close, when we started winning, I’m guessing those numbers were much better. I would bet those numbers did go up at the end of the season, one big reason, when you are ahead late in the game they foul you like crazy, but this season, being behind most games, the opponent doesn't foul you so FT's are deceiving. Did you drawl fouls, or was it a benefit of just being ahead like late last year? The Dukes are 1-4 against the 5 teams with a worse conference record than they do. It’s a huge reason why they are still fighting for the bye. They simply can’t afford to lose this game tonight. I know, this is madness. We really only win if we get the led early and expand on it in the second half. We under use our bigs every game in a very big way. Dru keeps playing a guard oriented game, we are thin on guards. That's clear. The ESPN+ stream will be starting early to show the ceremony for Coach Fran Dunphy. The ESPN+ stream will be starting early to show the ceremony for Coach Fran Dunphy. Thanks, BluffHunter. I hope it’s a lengthy tribute that ices the La Salle team. The ESPN+ stream will be starting early to show the ceremony for Coach Fran Dunphy. Thanks, BluffHunter. I hope it’s a lengthy tribute that ices the La Salle team. Stream is on! That is an awesome start. Those alley oops…! Rozier makes a stupid file on a 3 point shot that wasn’t close n Crawford shoots 2 fouls… air ball on a file shot n hitting the front of the room on the second. Rozier makes a stupid file on a 3 point shot that wasn’t close n Crawford shoots 2 fouls… air ball on a file shot n hitting the front of the room on the second. Rozier just dribbles around. The offense grinds to a halt He’s quick enough to get to spot then he doesn’t make something happen from it. Nobody on the team can drive and score. Number one priority has to be to get a slasher/scorer. I think the 2nd half plan has to be to get the ball inside to Wilborn/Dixon/Chabi over and over. That will get some shooters open on the perimeter if they start doubling inside. Transition needs to continue too. If Lasalle keeps shooting poorly we have to push the action. Rozier makes a stupid file on a 3 point shot that wasn’t close n Crawford shoots 2 fouls… air ball on a file shot n hitting the front of the room on the second. Rozier makes a stupid file on a 3 point shot that wasn’t close n Crawford shoots 2 fouls… air ball on a file shot n hitting the front of the room on the second. Was actually Corbett who airballed the free throw. Rozier makes a stupid file on a 3 point shot that wasn’t close n Crawford shoots 2 fouls… air ball on a file shot n hitting the front of the room on the second. Great start, but Dru subbed in too early. It just took the life out of that hot start. Dinkins and Crawford and Eli are on tonight. I'd like to see them in more often in the second half. In the final 15:43 of the first half, the Dukes scored 13 points. Abysmal offense. No points from Hronsky, Corbett and Edwards. Thankfully they continued to play defense. Embarrassing that we have let them stay in this game Embarrassing that we have let them stay in this game Dinkins trying to be the hometown hero. It hurts to watch this crap. Well, I am pleased to say that Ellis Cannon is miles better than both of these two announcers. This is tough to bear! Finish strong Dukes! Last edited by CityDuke (2/26/2025 8:41 pm)
This forum is hosted for free by Boardhost. Create your own free forum!
Offline
Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
Duquesne heads to Philadelphia fresh off of the Fran Dunphy retirement announcement. The university will be holding a ceremony for the coach pregame and the Dukes need to be prepared for the crowd and the magnitude of the event. 6:30 PM tip-off at the brand-new Glaser Arena, February 26th.
Coverage on ESPN+ with Kale Beers and Richie Tarr
Radio 104.7 HD2 with Ray Goss and Noah Buono
KenPom:
#147 Duquesne (11-16)(6-8) Best wins vs. #73 UC Irvine, #82 Saint Joseph's, #97 Saint Bonaventure
#237 La Salle (12-15)(4-10) Best wins vs. #97 Saint Bonaventure, #104 George Washington, #130 Rhode Island
NET:
#159 Duquesne
#229 La Salle
Haslametrics:
#148 Duquesne - 71
#248 La Salle - 68
BartTorvik:
#132 Duquesne - 70
#236 La Salle - 68
Duquesne Preview:
La Salle Preview, "Men's Basketball to Honor Fran Dunphy as Explorers Host Duquesne":
A10 Standings:
Betting:
Spread: Duquesne -1.5
Moneyline: Duquesne -115, La Salle -105
Over/Under 139.5 (FanDuel)
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
We lost two CONSISTENT scorers last year and a consistent rebounder. We have 1 consistent scorer at times and if he is shut down no one picks up the slack. We don’t have the “one” consistent rebounder. We “should” win tomorrow night if the players do well. Profound statement, isn’t it!! don’t think we win or lose the game because of the head coach Wednesday.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
FAM wrote:
We lost two CONSISTENT scorers last year and a consistent rebounder. We have 1 consistent scorer at times and if he is shut down no one picks up the slack. We don’t have the “one” consistent rebounder. We “should” win tomorrow night if the players do well. Profound statement, isn’t it!! don’t think we win or lose the game because of the head coach Wednesday.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
FAM wrote:
We lost two CONSISTENT scorers last year and a consistent rebounder. We have 1 consistent scorer at times and if he is shut down no one picks up the slack. We don’t have the “one” consistent rebounder. We “should” win tomorrow night if the players do well. Profound statement, isn’t it!! don’t think we win or lose the game because of the head coach Wednesday.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
Ironduke81 wrote:
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
Where these guys fall very, very short is that they can’t get to the FT line. Crawford’s FT rate is 14.9% and Dinkins’ 25.3% (as compared to the average D-1 player this year at 33.0% and Dukes as a whole at 29.7%). Combined, they have only shot 91 FT’s this year and probably will not get to 120 for the year. Last year, Dae Dae got to the line 152 times and Jimmy 143 times.
These 2 guards at best are decidedly average and more minutes are just going to continue the mediocrity. Just not a lot of options at guard for Coach Dru. Pick your poison.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
PhoenixRising2 wrote:
Where these guys fall very, very short is that they can’t get to the FT line. Crawford’s FT rate is 14.9% and Dinkins’ 25.3% (as compared to the average D-1 player this year at 33.0% and Dukes as a whole at 29.7%). Combined, they have only shot 91 FT’s this year and probably will not get to 120 for the year. Last year, Dae Dae got to the line 152 times and Jimmy 143 times.
These 2 guards at best are decidedly average and more minutes are just going to continue the mediocrity. Just not a lot of options at guard for Coach Dru. Pick your poison.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
PhoenixRising2 wrote:
Where these guys fall very, very short is that they can’t get to the FT line. Crawford’s FT rate is 14.9% and Dinkins’ 25.3% (as compared to the average D-1 player this year at 33.0% and Dukes as a whole at 29.7%). Combined, they have only shot 91 FT’s this year and probably will not get to 120 for the year. Last year, Dae Dae got to the line 152 times and Jimmy 143 times.
These 2 guards at best are decidedly average and more minutes are just going to continue the mediocrity. Just not a lot of options at guard for Coach Dru. Pick your poison.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
Styles1229 wrote:
PhoenixRising2 wrote:
Where these guys fall very, very short is that they can’t get to the FT line. Crawford’s FT rate is 14.9% and Dinkins’ 25.3% (as compared to the average D-1 player this year at 33.0% and Dukes as a whole at 29.7%). Combined, they have only shot 91 FT’s this year and probably will not get to 120 for the year. Last year, Dae Dae got to the line 152 times and Jimmy 143 times.
These 2 guards at best are decidedly average and more minutes are just going to continue the mediocrity. Just not a lot of options at guard for Coach Dru. Pick your poison.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
PhoenixRising2 wrote:
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
•
Thread Starter
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
BluffHunter wrote:
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
PhoenixRising2 wrote:
BluffHunter wrote:
•
Thread Starter
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
•
Thread Starter
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
We don’t have enough consistent players. Maximus needs to play more n no Rozier the second half please.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
FAM wrote:
We don’t have enough consistent players. Maximus needs to play more n no Rozier the second half please.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
FAM wrote:
We don’t have enough consistent players. Maximus needs to play more n no Rozier the second half please.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
SkepticAl wrote:
FAM wrote:
We don’t have enough consistent players. Maximus needs to play more n no Rozier the second half please.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
FAM wrote:
We don’t have enough consistent players. Maximus needs to play more n no Rozier the second half please.
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
•
Thread Starter
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
BluffHunter wrote:
Offline
Re: Game Thread - La Salle Explorers
BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE PARAMETERS:
-The comments & opinions on this fan message board are owned by their authors & we make no representation of their fitness, accuracy, and are held harmless.
-This is an independent fan board not affiliated with Duquesne University.
-This fan message board is for YOUR enjoyment (even if it's not a good year!)
We want to thank everyone for their continued love and support for Duquesne University Basketball. GO DUKES!