Welcome to SHOO-SHOO, RAH-RAH! The Duquesne Dukes Basketball Fan Message Board!
One of America's Great Message Boards - Any Inappropriate Posts Will Be Deleted! Posting on this Message Board is a privilege, not a right. No obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable material, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected is to be posted. All postings belong to the individual poster. Postings/posters may be deleted if found objectionable.

duke-passing

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



12/17/2015 8:50 pm  #1


Bobby Mo

Just beat 1-8 LeHigh 69-67 for their 2nd win. Pretty ugly game. We should be able to end the 5 game streak with them if we don't lay an egg.

 

12/18/2015 2:55 pm  #2


 

12/18/2015 3:26 pm  #3


Re: Bobby Mo

Disappointed to read that Mr Meyer gets the sense that the administration isn't fully committed to athletics.   I guess that news isn't a revelation to anyone here.

FYI I never heard about that letter RMU's president wrote to the PG. (link inside above article).  Real classy of him to point out that Duquesne hasn't been to the tournament since 1977.  Real classy.

Last edited by duqkurt (12/18/2015 3:30 pm)

 

12/18/2015 5:43 pm  #4


Re: Bobby Mo

I always wondered why a school that sticks their coaches with OOC losses by getting paid to lose to bigger schools and gets into the NCAA in past years due to good coaches and crummy conference could have leap frogged Duquesne. Then I look at the AD's and past coaches and wonder why it is only 5 straight losses.

Maybe we can break that streak and end the parity in basketball this year and get this to be a sure W as it once was.

Good Luck Dukes, oh yeah TJ lost his starting job after leading his 76 ers' to a 1-26 start, ( for all TJ fans)


A diehard fan since 1961
 

12/18/2015 6:26 pm  #5


Re: Bobby Mo

Dukurt:  "Disappointed to read that Mr Meyer gets the sense that the administration isn't fully committed to athletics.   I guess that news isn't a revelation to anyone here.

FYI I never heard about that letter RMU's president wrote to the PG. (link inside above article).  Real classy of him to point out that Duquesne hasn't been to the tournament since 1977.  Real classy.
Last edited by duqkurt (Today 3:30 pm)"

How in God's name do you interpret that a Meyer gets that sense that a President, who has yet to take office and the current AD, who has been in office less than two months, aren't fully committed to athletics?  Of course we know that the current lame duck president wasn't so committed nor was John Edward Murray, Jr. nor were their string of AD lap dogs.  Meyer makes the point of why and how Duquesne got where it currently is and what the prior people in ivory towers did not do.  How about giving Harper and Gormley a little bit of breathing room?  Things are changing a little already in the one major sport at Duquesne that Meyer focused on in case you haven't noticed. You get disappointed to easily
   

Last edited by grammudder (12/18/2015 6:27 pm)

 

12/18/2015 7:19 pm  #6


Re: Bobby Mo

grammudder wrote:

Dukurt:  "Disappointed to read that Mr Meyer gets the sense that the administration isn't fully committed to athletics.   I guess that news isn't a revelation to anyone here.

FYI I never heard about that letter RMU's president wrote to the PG. (link inside above article).  Real classy of him to point out that Duquesne hasn't been to the tournament since 1977.  Real classy.
Last edited by duqkurt (Today 3:30 pm)"

How in God's name do you interpret that a Meyer gets that sense that a President, who has yet to take office and the current AD, who has been in office less than two months, aren't fully committed to athletics?  Of course we know that the current lame duck president wasn't so committed nor was John Edward Murray, Jr. nor were their string of AD lap dogs.  Meyer makes the point of why and how Duquesne got where it currently is and what the prior people in ivory towers did not do.  How about giving Harper and Gormley a little bit of breathing room?  Things are changing a little already in the one major sport at Duquesne that Meyer focused on in case you haven't noticed. You get disappointed to easily
   

"As I mentioned earlier, I’ve only covered Duquesne briefly, but if you talk to enough people there, you get the general sense that there isn’t that same level of commitment from those at the top of the university. It’s not as if nothing is being done to support the school’s sports programs, but, for one reason or another, not enough is being done, especially when compared to other universities in the increasingly-competitive Atlantic 10."

Meyers quote from the article. 

That's how I get it.  I swear you just troll my comments looking to jump down my throat.

I say positive things about the women's team all the time.   You never post after I make positive comments.  I went to all but one football game

I like Mr Harper.   I'm happy about being 9-2.

  I don't like you at all.

Last edited by duqkurt (12/18/2015 7:22 pm)

 

12/19/2015 12:15 am  #7


Re: Bobby Mo

I don't care if you like me or not.  I don't know you and can't conclude if I like you or not.  I did not like or agree with your comment about your interpretation of Craig Meyer's article. Don't pat yourself on the back about how many games you go to.   I am probably  a lot older than you and I don't need to play a numbers game on how many of the Duquesne athletic teams I have witnessed or supported over the years.  Your comments on the women's team are apt.  Ditto on the football team.  You just seem to like to jam it down the throat of any administrator who does not do your biding.  My point is clear.  Don't conclude and then suggest that Gormley and Harper are in the same group of persons identified by Meyer.  They haven't had the time or opportunity to make their respective marks on the University and Athletic Department respectively.  Yet you seem to be able to be "disappointed" again and again over the administration. That is precisely why I commented which, in turn, caused you to conclude that I am a troll!!  

 

12/19/2015 7:30 am  #8


Re: Bobby Mo

And all you do is kiss the ass of whoever is in power at the time.   "Yes, Greg and Charlie we love you.   You can't do anything wrong."

It will take a lot more than Harper's commitment to make mens bb successful.   It is apparent that RMU's president had everyone in the university on board (board members, other high ranking staff) all working towards the goal of improving RMU athletics.   Perhaps Meyer doesn't see that same commitment at DU.

He said "those at the top of the university".  Those implies more than just one.

Last edited by duqkurt (12/19/2015 7:43 am)

 

12/19/2015 8:43 am  #9


Re: Bobby Mo

Here we go into name calling.  I merely pointed out your lack of judgment in your interpretation of an article that led to your being "disappointed".  You seem to enjoy in casting aspersions on the administration because "enough" nameless "people" don't think enough is being done as compared to what other increasingly competitive A-10 universities were doing.  (Parenthetically, those "nameless" people who Craig quotes are probably those who think they should maybe paid more money.)   Now you have me smooching the butts of presidents and AD's past.  Pay attention to what I said and I quote "Of course we know that the current lame duck president wasn't so committed nor was John Edward Murray, Jr. nor were their string of AD lap dogs.  Meyer makes the point of why and how Duquesne got where it currently is and what the prior people in ivory towers did not do."  =14.625pxDoesn't sound like these lips have gotten up close and personal with Charlie, John Edward Murray, Jr. and/or Greg.  Never have and never would have.  But your powers of perception would conclude otherwise.  As an aside, who hired Jake Schmidt, Dan Burt and Jim Ferry?   MERRY CHRISTMAS, KURT!!!!

 

12/19/2015 8:48 am  #10


Re: Bobby Mo

It has been a very long time when I have gotten extremely upset over a loss.  A few decades ago it was Pitt but since they moved so far ahead of us my objectivity took over and I couldn't get upset over losing to a basketball program so superior, though I still can't stand Pitt in anything.  I am sick and tired of our team losing to Robert Morris.  I hope the players don't get tight (I don't think they will) like they did against Pitt.  I would love to see them not just win, but smash them.  If we don't, my old Eat S--- Pitt feelings will come back but against Bob Mo.  Go Dukes!

Last edited by FAM (12/19/2015 8:49 am)

 

12/19/2015 1:44 pm  #11


Re: Bobby Mo

If we lose to Bobby Mo I'm canceling my season tickets. Oh wait. I've already done that.

     Thread Starter
 

12/19/2015 2:59 pm  #12


Re: Bobby Mo

This is an ugly game.

     Thread Starter
 

12/19/2015 3:06 pm  #13


Re: Bobby Mo

If we were having even an average shooting game we would be up 15 or so

 

12/19/2015 3:11 pm  #14


Re: Bobby Mo

Bobby Mo playing a pretty tough zone. I'm looking for both teams to shoot better in the 2nnd half. Need to cut down turnovers.

     Thread Starter
 

12/19/2015 3:48 pm  #15


Re: Bobby Mo

Micah having a horrible game

 

12/19/2015 4:01 pm  #16


Re: Bobby Mo

Well, we won despite playing like garbage.


"You have to be realistic about these things."  - Logen Ninefingers
 

12/19/2015 4:02 pm  #17


Re: Bobby Mo

Again, this game is a sign that we are a much improved team. Had arguably our worst shooting game of the year but the guys played really strong defense and made free throws down the stretch. Feels good to restore order

 

12/19/2015 4:05 pm  #18


Re: Bobby Mo

A lot of unforced turn overs, Mason missed almost everything. Thanks to DC, the senior took the game over and couldn't miss from the line, 10-2, Merry Christmas!


A diehard fan since 1961
 

12/19/2015 4:12 pm  #19


Re: Bobby Mo

Dukes2012 wrote:

Again, this game is a sign that we are a much improved team. Had arguably our worst shooting game of the year but the guys played really strong defense and made free throws down the stretch. Feels good to restore order

Agreed:  This is their 3rd game where they started out cold and their two best shooters were missing a lot.  Results have been:  Pepperdine,  similar team to them cruises to an easy win.  Pitt, superior team to them ends the game six minutes in.  Robert Morris:  garbage team, Dukes fight through their woes and manage to pull out the win. 

Good teams do this.
 


Vicimus Atlanticum decem
 

12/19/2015 4:12 pm  #20


Re: Bobby Mo

 We won but very easily could have lost.  One point game with 90 seconds left.  Thank goodness Colter made his FTs.  Too many stupid turnovers and missed layups.  But hey it's a "W".   

 

12/19/2015 4:19 pm  #21


Re: Bobby Mo

This game shows what every A-10 opponent is going to do. Shut down the perimeter shooting and make us win inside.  RM shucks this season and shut down our perimeter, but only for James,  Lewis and the perimeter players driving to penetrate, made up for the bricks we were throwing from3 range. Eric James is the most athletic and talented player Ferry has and should start from here out. Lewis is a legitimate center and Ferry should center a big part of the conf. games to James and Lewis for the shot.  Every A-10 team is going to try to shut down Micah and Colter, so like this game, wide open 3's are going to be rare, but if Ferry forces the ball inside from the tip-off, then you open the 3's up later in the game in the A-10.  This game shows the weakness in the 3 ball game, when it ain't there. Good game for James. Let's hope it the breakout game for Eric as a starter.   Ugly game only from the outside, but  pretty good game from the inside players. Go Dukes. Develop the hard-nose inside game, get ugly, and win some down the stretch that maybe none of us expect to win. Ugly game, smart coaching.      

 

12/19/2015 4:21 pm  #22


Re: Bobby Mo

CLK wrote:

 We won but very easily could have lost.  One point game with 90 seconds left.  Thank goodness Colter made his FTs.  Too many stupid turnovers and missed layups.  But hey it's a "W".   

4-27 on treys and won by 7.

Jones goes down and Eric James steps and we dont miss a beat.

Jim ferry has absolutely added depth to this program. Raise your hand if you thought we would shoot 4-27 on treys and still win a game this year.  Didn't think so.

 

12/19/2015 4:21 pm  #23


Re: Bobby Mo

That game set college basketball back 10 years. U-g-l-y.

 

12/19/2015 4:22 pm  #24


Re: Bobby Mo

59-33 on rebounds. Is this accurate?

 

12/19/2015 4:23 pm  #25


Re: Bobby Mo

WEB wrote:

CLK wrote:

 We won but very easily could have lost.  One point game with 90 seconds left.  Thank goodness Colter made his FTs.  Too many stupid turnovers and missed layups.  But hey it's a "W".   

4-27 on treys and won by 7.

Jones goes down and Eric James steps and we dont miss a beat.

Jim ferry has absolutely added depth to this program. Raise your hand if you thought we would shoot 4-27 on treys and still win a game this year. Didn't think so.

Maybe when you are shooting 4-for-27 from 3-point range, YOU SHOULD TRY SOMETHING ELSE!

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum


BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE PARAMETERS:
-The comments & opinions on this fan message board are owned by their authors & we make No representation of their fitness, accuracy, and are held harmless.
-This is an independent fan board not affiliated with Duquesne University.
-This fan message board is for YOUR enjoyment (even if everyone doesn't agree).
We want to thank everyone for their continued love and support for Duquesne University Basketball. GO DUKES!