Welcome to SHOO-SHOO, RAH-RAH! The Duquesne Dukes Basketball Fan Message Board!
One of America's Great Message Boards - Any Inappropriate Posts Will Be Deleted!

duke-passing



You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



3/20/2016 10:45 am  #1


Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Duquesne double header.  Men at 7:00 Free Video  http://ovcdigitalnetwork.com/watch/?Live=3364

Women at 9:00 ESPN 2

Go Dukes!

 

3/20/2016 12:53 pm  #2


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Thanks, CLK. The last time that the Dukes played Morehead State, the starting lineup was Mike Barr, Wojdowski, Montanez, Roebuck and Billingy in December 1971.

 

3/20/2016 1:59 pm  #3


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

And the most hilarious variation on a man's name is Craven Morehead...


WE ARE CREEPING UP TO THE SECOND FLOOR....
 

3/20/2016 2:29 pm  #4


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Pheonix -  Those must have been the "REAL IRON DUKES" - SIX men on the roster - after Dave Roddy was declared inelligble - they added a character named Brian Devine who was from Community College -  (wasn't even one of the better players from ACC - but WAS available)

If I remember correctly - NO WALK-ONS -  They looked AWFUL Intimidating doing the "lay up drills" which every team did in practice - Three on a side!!

 

3/20/2016 2:55 pm  #5


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

I was thinking Agnes Ken. But that's funny.

 

3/20/2016 2:59 pm  #6


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Roddy was available for the first half of the year before being declared ineligible. The only other scholarship player was Dave Harrington, a little used forward. Definitely the Iron Dukes, who got blocked from the postseason due to the Roddy situation in spite of a 20-5 record that year.

 

3/20/2016 5:26 pm  #7


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

PhoenixRising2 wrote:

Roddy was available for the first half of the year before being declared ineligible. The only other scholarship player was Dave Harrington, a little used forward. Definitely the Iron Dukes, who got blocked from the postseason due to the Roddy situation in spite of a 20-5 record that year.

That team could have had Mickey Davis, and Ed Searcy as the forwards. Would have been a serious Final Four contender, Red would have never retired, and we likely would have been in the BE from day one.
 

 

3/20/2016 7:59 pm  #8


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

I went to everyone of those games, the Dukes played Nebraska that year and Maryland, they were ranked and Billingy was considered one of the best big man in the East, he battled Glen Price of Bona and Marvin Barnes of Providence. I loved that team, they played well together, Darnell Roebuck of Perry averaged 13 points a game and shot 65% or so and he and Jack W ( Canevin) were tough defenders, both at 6-4.

Ruben would have been a great 3 point 2 guard in today's game, Mike Barr could handle the Rock and did a ton of assists before they counted them.

Even if Mickey hadn't quit and they would have more diligent on Roddy eligilbility ( I think Smizk brought it up) they would have been an NCAA team in the then 16 team field, they were that good.


A diehard fan since 1961
 

3/20/2016 11:51 pm  #9


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Phildog wrote:

I went to everyone of those games, the Dukes played Nebraska that year and Maryland, they were ranked and Billingy was considered one of the best big man in the East, he battled Glen Price of Bona and Marvin Barnes of Providence. I loved that team, they played well together, Darnell Roebuck of Perry averaged 13 points a game and shot 65% or so and he and Jack W ( Canevin) were tough defenders, both at 6-4.

Ruben would have been a great 3 point 2 guard in today's game, Mike Barr could handle the Rock and did a ton of assists before they counted them.

Even if Mickey hadn't quit and they would have more diligent on Roddy eligilbility ( I think Smizk brought it up) they would have been an NCAA team in the then 16 team field, they were that good.

There were actually 25 teams in the field by 1972. I don't know when it went beyond 16, but the Dukes beat St. Joe's in 1969 to reach the Sweet 16, so there were probably 24 teams by then.
 

 

3/20/2016 11:53 pm  #10


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

1952 was the last year for 16 teams.

 

3/21/2016 10:28 am  #11


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

duq81 wrote:

1952 was the last year for 16 teams.

I think you are right, I recall a few years later that the conference champs were given automatic bids, most eastern schools were independents then, and later the runner ups to conference went to NIT.

My point was when Dukes were getting in it was an elite group of teams getting the invites, days gone by. 


A diehard fan since 1961
 

3/21/2016 11:32 am  #12


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

I totally forgot Kenneth Faried went to More Head State!

 

3/21/2016 3:24 pm  #13


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Duquesne is a 5.5 point underdog.   I say cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war!

     Thread Starter
 

3/21/2016 6:01 pm  #14


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

No TV tonight?


Vicimus Atlanticum decem
 

3/21/2016 6:08 pm  #15


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

http://ovcdigitalnetwork.com/watch/?Live=3364

Free stream, Audio is real choppy and Standard definition

 

3/21/2016 6:11 pm  #16


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

thanks I just found that myself 


Vicimus Atlanticum decem
 

3/21/2016 6:12 pm  #17


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

First 5 minutes and it is the usual LHTM Defense, ridiculous.  Uncontested 3's and generally anything 7' from the basket is uncontested.  Pleasssssssssssssssssseeeee Harper, make this guy hire a defensive assistant as he can't coach D a lick!!  Come to think of it, what real pedigree do these assistants have???????

 

3/21/2016 6:14 pm  #18


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Turning this stream off...I can't listen to it like this.  

 

3/21/2016 6:50 pm  #19


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Looked like a little momentum going into the half but then a half court shot. Ouch.

 

3/21/2016 6:51 pm  #20


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

I can't believe with 7 seconds left, Ferry let them roll in in to mid-court. Lucky, or unlucky they miss handled the ball. But our 2 senor guards can't handle the ball-pressure, can't set  plays,and missed a load of open shots.

 

3/21/2016 7:00 pm  #21


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Morehead shot 54.5% from the 3.  For the season, they shot 37.4%.  I don't want to hear from Ferry any coach speak if they lose.  He is responsible as head coach. I rather lose 54 to 44 then constantly get shredded with 3's. 

 

3/21/2016 7:03 pm  #22


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

we are 4 for 13,  3 point attempts at the half, They are  6 for 11,  It's the diff in the score.  30% from the field. Most of our misses were wide open 3's.

 

3/21/2016 7:17 pm  #23


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Also we've lost six Mason points on called fouls


Vicimus Atlanticum decem
 

3/21/2016 7:21 pm  #24


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Tejas_Duke wrote:

Also we've lost six Mason points on called fouls

I saw that, bad timing.

 

3/21/2016 7:24 pm  #25


Re: Let's be in it to win it! Next up Morehead State

Couple minutes ago, Robinson made an offensive play that none of the other bigs have shown. Catch, hang in the air, take the foul, and make the short shot. And he seldom gets minutes.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum