Offline

NEWS: A U.S. District Court judge in Colorado has granted a CLASS-WIDE preliminary injunction that requires the NCAA to declare ALL Class of 2022 athletes eligible for a fifth year of eligibility
Offline
CLK wrote:
NEWS: A U.S. District Court judge in Colorado has granted a CLASS-WIDE preliminary injunction that requires the NCAA to declare ALL Class of 2022 athletes eligible for a fifth year of eligibility
Thanks CLK
TG is among the players eligible!
Offline

So is David Dixon. This is a massive ruling across all sports.
So I researched this relative to roster limits. What it means: If a team already has 14 or 15 players signed and wants to take back 2 of their newly eligible seniors, they can expand their operational roster to 16 or 17 without facing NCAA fines, forfeited games, or postseason bans. The court order explicitly enjoins the NCAA from punishing schools under the "Rule of Restitution" or for "rostering them above House Settlement roster caps".
Offline

CLK wrote:
So is David Dixon. This is a massive ruling across all sports.
So I researched this relative to roster limits. What it means: If a team already has 14 or 15 players signed and wants to take back 2 of their newly eligible seniors, they can expand their operational roster to 16 or 17 without facing NCAA fines, forfeited games, or postseason bans. The court order explicitly enjoins the NCAA from punishing schools under the "Rule of Restitution" or for "rostering them above House Settlement roster caps".
UPDATE:
The Colorado Judge issued a clarification, she clarified that her injunction ONLY grants athletes in the class a fifth year. It *does not* enjoin transfer rules, roster caps, rev share caps, etc.
So teams can't expand their roster beyond the hard 15 player limit. Duquesne has one open spot, and is making a hard push to get Guinyard to come back. It is between Dayton and Duquesne with a decision expected soon.
Offline
CLK wrote:
CLK wrote:
So is David Dixon. This is a massive ruling across all sports.
So I researched this relative to roster limits. What it means: If a team already has 14 or 15 players signed and wants to take back 2 of their newly eligible seniors, they can expand their operational roster to 16 or 17 without facing NCAA fines, forfeited games, or postseason bans. The court order explicitly enjoins the NCAA from punishing schools under the "Rule of Restitution" or for "rostering them above House Settlement roster caps".UPDATE:
The Colorado Judge issued a clarification, she clarified that her injunction ONLY grants athletes in the class a fifth year. It *does not* enjoin transfer rules, roster caps, rev share caps, etc.
So teams can't expand their roster beyond the hard 15 player limit. Duquesne has one open spot, and is making a hard push to get Guinyard to come back. It is between Dayton and Duquesne with a decision expected soon.
TG choosing Dayton over Duquesne would really hurt.
Offline
Goodness, imagine losing him to Dayton via a court case that allows the wild wild west to become even more wild. That would sting. TBH, couldnt blame him tho.
IDK why Dixon would come back, unless he is working on another degree.
Offline
I think Dixon signed a pro contract in Europe. Not certain. As to TG, how much money does DU have left for players? It’s all about money. Sucks. But true.
Offline
Mike Ignelsi wrote:
I think Dixon signed a pro contract in Europe. Not certain. As to TG, how much money does DU have left for players? It’s all about money. Sucks. But true.
I just looked at Dayton, looks like they signed 9 players this offseason. But obviously the can round up some money real quick, and appear to have a need for a guy like TG.
Offline
CLK wrote:
CLK wrote:
So is David Dixon. This is a massive ruling across all sports.
So I researched this relative to roster limits. What it means: If a team already has 14 or 15 players signed and wants to take back 2 of their newly eligible seniors, they can expand their operational roster to 16 or 17 without facing NCAA fines, forfeited games, or postseason bans. The court order explicitly enjoins the NCAA from punishing schools under the "Rule of Restitution" or for "rostering them above House Settlement roster caps".UPDATE:
The Colorado Judge issued a clarification, she clarified that her injunction ONLY grants athletes in the class a fifth year. It *does not* enjoin transfer rules, roster caps, rev share caps, etc.
So teams can't expand their roster beyond the hard 15 player limit. Duquesne has one open spot, and is making a hard push to get Guinyard to come back. It is between Dayton and Duquesne with a decision expected soon.
I believe this includes Demin being a roster spot. Is he even with the team?
Offline

duq.dog wrote:
CLK wrote:
CLK wrote:
So is David Dixon. This is a massive ruling across all sports.
So I researched this relative to roster limits. What it means: If a team already has 14 or 15 players signed and wants to take back 2 of their newly eligible seniors, they can expand their operational roster to 16 or 17 without facing NCAA fines, forfeited games, or postseason bans. The court order explicitly enjoins the NCAA from punishing schools under the "Rule of Restitution" or for "rostering them above House Settlement roster caps".UPDATE:
The Colorado Judge issued a clarification, she clarified that her injunction ONLY grants athletes in the class a fifth year. It *does not* enjoin transfer rules, roster caps, rev share caps, etc.
So teams can't expand their roster beyond the hard 15 player limit. Duquesne has one open spot, and is making a hard push to get Guinyard to come back. It is between Dayton and Duquesne with a decision expected soon.I believe this includes Demin being a roster spot. Is he even with the team?
It is my understanding that he has signed and on campus.
Offline
Demir is signed and on campus? That would be nice!!!!
Last edited by townsonkid (Today 7:57 am)